The Kenyan 1500m runner Asbel Kiprop, another doping confirmed

Last week, the Kenyan newspaper ''The Standard'' revealed that a Kenyan athlete had a positive result in a test, but they did not reveal the name. Yesterday, we knew the name, Asbel Kiprop.

Asbel Kiprop, a Kenyan star who had won the gold medal in the Olympic Games of 2008, was accused of doping with EPO on 27 november 2017. Nevertheless, he said to the Britain newspaper ''The Guardian'' that he had not used this type of methods, and also, he had fought against doping in Kenya.

You can find information about EPO here: EPO review. Collected from https://www.msssi.gob.es/.

In a statement, the AIU (Athletics Integrity Unit) have said this: “The AIU is satisfied that there has been no mix-up or tampering with the sample and that the sample collected from the athlete on 27 November 2017 was the same sample analysed by the laboratory and reported as an adverse analytical finding.”. Moreover, they added: “The AIU has confirmed that the doping control assistant involved in testing Mr Kiprop on 27 November 2017 [who is known to Mr Kiprop] admitted that he provided Mr Kiprop with advanced notice of the testing that was to take place on that date. This is extremely disappointing.”

If you do not know who is Kiprop, you can watch this video:

The Kenyan star refused the results, and recognise that the test assistant had asked him for money, and as he did not give him the money, the assistant had changed the sample.

Now, Kiprop have to wait until the AIU, IAAF and WADA decision. Which do you think wouldbe the correct penalty for Kiprop? Do you think that assistants test can change the results of a doping test?

Thanks for reading us,
Sergio Torreblanca.

Bibliography:
http://ecodiario.eleconomista.es/internacional/noticias/9111434/05/18/Estrella-del-atletismo-keniano-da-positivo-por-dopaje-medios.html
https://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/deportes/2018/05/04/confirmado-doping-epo-campeon-olimpico-1500-pekin/00031525455227130573131.htm
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/may/04/epo-suspect-asbel-kiprop-athletics-integrity-unit
http://www.marca.com/atletismo/2018/05/04/5aec969a268e3e12648b459f.html
García L., Antorán B. & López A. (2009). Eritropoyetina: revisión de sus indicaciones. Sistema Nacional de Salud, 33(1): 3-9.

What are the TUEs? – A controversal topic

Welcome everyone again, in this new post, we are going to talk in depth about the Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs).

In previous posts we talked about a recent new, the assumption doping of Bradley Wiggins in 2012 and others irregularities in the Team Sky. This topic is controversal due to the supposed doping was produced for an excessive use of a substance considered as a TUE.

Image 1. Salbutamol (Ventolín) one of the TUE drugs more used nowadays. 

The TUEs are prohibited substances for WADA that can be used in exceptional chases for some athletes claiming theraupetic reasons previously. With the purpose of regulate this issue the WADA developed The International Standard for Use of Therapeutic Exemptions. In this mandatory International Standard is established the main conditions for achieve a TUE:

If an athlete have all these conditions and finally request a TUE, this application have to be assseded for the Therapeutic Use Exemption Committee (TUEC). As a last resort, is the WADA TUEC the panel in charge for review the TUE decisions of other Anti-Doping Organizations. You can download the template of TUE application form clikcing here.

According to the established in The International Standard for Use of Therapeutic Exemptions:

An Athlete who needs a TUE should apply as soon as possible. For substances prohibited In-Competition only, the Athlete should apply for a TUE at least 30 days before his/her next Competition, unless it is an emergency or exceptional situation. The Athlete should apply to his/her National Anti-Doping Organization, International Federation and/or a Major Event Organization (as applicable), using the TUE application form provided.

The form must be accompanied by:

a. a statement by an appropriately qualified physician, attesting to the need for the Athlete to Use the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method in question for Therapeutic reasons; and

b. a comprehensive medical history, including documentation from the original diagnosing physician(s) (where possible) and the results of all examinations, laboratory investigations and imaging studies relevant to the application.

Each TUE will have a specified duration, as decided by the TUEC, at the end of which the TUE will expire automatically. If the Athlete needs to continue to Use the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method after the expiry date, he/she must submit an application for a new TUE well in advance of that expiry date, so that there is sufficient time for a decision to be made on the application before the expiry date.

In the next drawing, we can see the process necessary for an non-international-level athlete for achieve a TUE.

Image 2. Process to get a TUE for an Non-International-Level Athlete.

In the chase, of international-level athlete or major events the process is longer and complicated, if

you are interested in know more about it you can read the whole information here.