Asbel Kiprop, a Kenyan star who had won the gold medal in the Olympic Games of 2008, was accused of doping with EPO on 27 november 2017. Nevertheless, he said to the Britain newspaper ''The Guardian'' that he had not used this type of methods, and also, he had fought against doping in Kenya.
You can find information about EPO here: EPO review. Collected from https://www.msssi.gob.es/.
In a statement, the AIU (Athletics Integrity Unit) have said this: “The AIU is satisfied that there has been no mix-up or tampering with the sample and that the sample collected from the athlete on 27 November 2017 was the same sample analysed by the laboratory and reported as an adverse analytical finding.”. Moreover, they added: “The AIU has confirmed that the doping control assistant involved in testing Mr Kiprop on 27 November 2017 [who is known to Mr Kiprop] admitted that he provided Mr Kiprop with advanced notice of the testing that was to take place on that date. This is extremely disappointing.”
If you do not know who is Kiprop, you can watch this video:
The Kenyan star refused the results, and recognise that the test assistant had asked him for money, and as he did not give him the money, the assistant had changed the sample.
Now, Kiprop have to wait until the AIU, IAAF and WADA decision. Which do you think wouldbe the correct penalty for Kiprop? Do you think that assistants test can change the results of a doping test?
Thanks for reading us,
Sergio Torreblanca.
Bibliography:
http://ecodiario.eleconomista.es/internacional/noticias/9111434/05/18/Estrella-del-atletismo-keniano-da-positivo-por-dopaje-medios.html
https://www.lavozdegalicia.es/noticia/deportes/2018/05/04/confirmado-doping-epo-campeon-olimpico-1500-pekin/00031525455227130573131.htm
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2018/may/04/epo-suspect-asbel-kiprop-athletics-integrity-unit
http://www.marca.com/atletismo/2018/05/04/5aec969a268e3e12648b459f.html
García L., Antorán B. & López A. (2009). Eritropoyetina: revisión de sus indicaciones. Sistema Nacional de Salud, 33(1): 3-9.
No comments:
Post a Comment